|
Inexperience with Auto Exposure & Auto Focus
Ruined My Day
Steve Hoffmann's Nature and Landscape
Photography
This summer, 2005, I took a 2 week Vacation on Vancouver
Island, BC, Canada. The Island is heavily forested with lots of
interesting flora and fauna. I hired a guide for a 'Black Bear
Viewing' outing. The tour was conducted from a 4 wheel drive truck
with some short walking side trips. My guide told me that the bears
don't always stand and pose so I should be ready for fast action. Almost all
of my photography has been with a tripod mounted camera in manual
mode using spot metering. I have had almost no experience with action
photography or even getting set up for a quick shot.
I had about 8 seconds to get this photo which was
the first shot of the day. I didn't
even have the truck window rolled down. The guide was laughing his
head off watching me trying to crank down the window and get my
100-400 lens
on target. Can't say he didn't warn me. I had previously decided to set my 1Ds Mark II on auto
focus single frame, auto exposure in aperture priority mode at f8
and ISO 400. We had bright sunlight so I figured I'd be around 1/500
- 1/800 sec with my 100-400 Canon zoom. I usually use spot meter and
thoughtlessly left the camera in that mode. The bear started out
about 20 yards from the truck. He ran about 40 more yards and
stopped for a look at us. I got one shot and the bear took off
again.

EXIF and exposure info as follows: spot
meter mode, aperture priority auto exposure, ISO 400, 1/320
sec, f8, one shot AF with central spot,
100-400 Canon @ 400mm. |
 |
| |
|
| Spot metering off the black
bear and the little bit of green foliage (red insert area) caused a
little overexposed for the overall content but I
got lucky as the slight overexposure brought out a little more
detail in the black bear. However, the AF sensor "saw" the
bit of green foliage instead of my bear so I got bad front focus.
You can see the soft focus on the bear and a close up of the
approximate
AF area in the 50% magnification screen capture on the right. It gets even better, read worse, in the
four image series below. We were walking down a logging road and we knew
there were two bears not far down a rather steep hill below
us. One of them sensed us and made a break. He didn't know
where we were on the road and he broke cover only about 30 feet
from us and galloped up the road. I had time for 4 quick
shots. I zoomed back to 100mm and fired away. The camera settings from EXIF as follows: aperture priority auto exposure,
ISO 400, f8, one shot AF with central spot, partial metering,100-400 Canon @ 100mm.
After the first photo
experience shown above I figured partial metering mode would be safe - WRONG - read
the manual. The camera selected
shutter speeds were the failure in this series, and they are
listed on each image below.
The shooting sequence starts
upper left and goes clockwise. I would have never guessed that
partial metering would have given so much exposure weight to the
BLACK bear. I would have known better if I done a little
refresher reading of the camera's operational manual before
I left for this outing. 'Partial metering' gives the greatest weight to the
central 8.5% of the image....Oh well.....At the time I
thought partial was the same as 'center weighted averaging'.
I should have used 'Evaluative' or the actual 'Center
weighted Averaged' auto exposure metering mode. Also worth
noting is that I probably would have been much better off
using 'AI servo' mode for the auto focusing mode.
Due to the camera's 'partial metering'
mode giving so much weight to the 'black' bear the shutter
speeds the camera selected were not fast enough to produce
sharp images. The camera metering system was just trying to
achieve a 'middle
gray' exposure average between the 'black' bear and the
small area of 'bright background' that was in the central
8.5% of the viewfinder. The result was incorrect and very
slow shutter speeds for ISO 400 at f8 in bright sunlight.
The bear was moving and I was panning the
camera to follow the bear, lots of subject and camera
movement. 1/500 to 1/800 sec might have been OK but for really
sharp photos in this situation 1/1000 sec or higher would
have been even better. I believe focus was close to accurate.
The end
result of my inappropriate camera setup and letting the
camera do the thinking for me was overexposed and blurry photos of a panicked bear.
Not even good enough for a decent souvenir photo. |
| |
 |
 |
| |
|
 |
 |
| |
|
| The moral of this
story is don't go hunting for bears armed with a
peashooter's worth of experience, knowledge and
preparation...:^) |
Beginners Level Digital Darkroom Slide Show Tutorial
Digital Darkroom Imaging and Printing Tech Tips
Photography Tech Tips
A Practical Guide to Interpreting RGB Histograms
Digital Camera Raw Converter Comparisons
Digital SLR vs. Film Scans
DSLR Sensor Size and Pixel
Density
Aftermarket Scanner Control Software
My Photo Equipment
Building Your First Web Site Mini Tutorial
LEGACY* EQUIPMENT REVIEWS
Nikon Super Coolscan 4000 ED Film Scanner Review
Nikon LS2000 Film Scanner Review
HP S20 Film Scanner Review
HP PhotoSmart 1100 Printer Review
HP Original PhotoSmart Printer and Scanner Review
Comments or Questions
*legacy = not the manufacturer's current product
You are visitor #
2,997 (1 today, 23 this week, 65 this
month, 544 this year)
. Thanks for visiting.
|